The Choice for Wisconsin: Judge Maria Lazar vs. Chris Taylor

Judge Maria Lazar believes the court’s job is to be an impartial referee, not a policy-maker. As a strict constitutional originalist, she ensures the court remains a stable, predictable branch of government.

Chris Taylor has been described by critics as a judicial activist. Her "people-centered" approach suggests that personal political leanings could override the literal text of the law, essentially "legislating from the bench."

Judge Lazar is a staunch defender of election integrity, advocating for the strict application of legislative rules like voter ID to maintain public trust.

Chris Taylor consistently opposed Wisconsin’s election security measures during her time in the legislature, pushing for expansions that critics argue create loopholes and undermine ballot security.

Judge Lazar has a proven track record of upholding the rule of law. Judge Maria Lazar will uphold the current law on the books providing a 20-week compromise deal on abortion.

Chris Taylor wrote a law in 2017 attempting to remove any and all restrictions on abortion in the state of Wisconsin allowing for abortion up to birth.

Judge Lazar is a seasoned jurist. From the Waukesha County Circuit Court to the Court of Appeals, her career is defined by the sober, daily application of law.

Chris Taylor is a high-profile political operative. Before the bench, she was a partisan Democrat in the Assembly and a director for Planned Parenthood, leading many to fear she would turn the judiciary into a rubber stamp for a radical agenda.

Judge Lazar has dedicated her career to protecting the vulnerable, presiding over heart-wrenching cases of child abuse and neglect in juvenile court.

Chris Taylor claims to be an advocate, yet she voted twice against Marsy’s Law—a constitutional amendment for victims' rights that was eventually supported by nearly 80% of Wisconsin voters.